|
Chapter 8
Standard
Analysis
Background
The
purpose of this chapter is to assess the current level of service
(LOS) for Canby park and recreation
resources. To assess how well Canby’s park and recreation
facilities are serving the community, CPW consulted guidelines
from the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) and the
Oregon
Parks
and Recreation
Department.
Recognizing
that different communities have different needs, the NRPA and
Oregon
Parks
and Recreation
Department advocate a systems approach when determining park adequacy.
This approach places emphasis on locally identified needs and
desires and not on trying to achieve a blanket standard that may
or may not be responsive to community growth and desires.
A
systems approach takes into account the real demand on a given day and is an
assessment of common needs rather than a professional judgment made by an
outside source. This systems approach to park planning is detailed in Park, Recreation Open Space and Greenway Guidelines published in
1995 by the NRPA. These guidelines are not to be considered rigid regulations
but should provide a framework in which a community can assess what recreation
areas and facilities exist, what the current level of service is, and what
recreation areas and facilities will be needed as the population grows. This
assessment provides a baseline to compare Canby’s future supply of parks.
CPW
assessed Canby’s parks and recreation system in six different
ways: (1) current park acreage, (2) current park acreage by type
of park, (3) current supply of recreation facilities, (4) service
area guidelines, (5) comparison with the 1997 Parks Master Plan
Update, and (6) comparison with population projections. The use
patterns, participation rates, demographic data and community
input form the basis for projecting demand and establishing guidelines
to meet that demand.
Methodology
To conduct
a standards analysis for Canby’s parks and recreation facilities,
CPW reviewed Canby’s park and recreation facilities using
nationally recognized guidelines published by the National Recreation
and Park Association (see Chapter 3). CPW also reviewed the Oregon
Outdoor Recreation Plan for state-level guidelines, and found
they are very similar to the national guidelines, which advocates
access to park and recreation facilities for all segments of the
population and tying these park and recreation resources together
via a comprehensive trail system. Recreation today is not strictly
confined to park-like settings. Often, part of the recreation experience
is in "the getting there." Thus, trails, paths, and bike
lanes/routes become important aspects of recreation.
| CPW
completed the following steps in the standards analysis: |
| * |
Identified
all City of Canby
parks and recreation facilities as well as non-city park
and recreation facilities, as detailed in Chapter 3, Park
and Recreation Facility Inventory; |
| * |
Compared
Canby’s current zoning delineations and new development
with the location and service area of current park and recreation
facilities. With the use of a geographic information system,
CPW spatially analyzed the data, and determined how neighborhoods
are being served by park and recreation facilities; |
| * |
Analyzed
community input from the 1997 Canby
Park and Recreation Community Survey, stakeholder interviews,
school meetings, and the
August 8, 2000
community forum.
This information told us what park and recreation facilities
and amenities residents value most and assisted us in identifying
appropriate level of service (LOS) guidelines for Canby
parks and recreation resources; |
| * |
Consulted
the 1997 Parks Master Plan Update to determine what changes
have been made in Canby’s park and recreation system
since its adoption; and |
| * |
Compared
Canby’s projected 15-year population with current
service levels to determine what level of new park and open
space development Canby will need to best serve its growing
population. |
National Guidelines
The
size and amount of parkland compared to the existing and projected population
is the basis for determining the level of service Canby will need in the
future. In addition to parks and open spaces, school facilities and other
non-municipal recreation opportunities should still be considered when
planning a well-rounded park and recreation system. Canby’s 1997 Park Master
Plan used NRPA’s 1983 guidelines to determine
the adequacy of Canby’s current and future supply of park and recreation
facilities. However, the 1983 guidelines were replaced by a newer set of
guidelines developed in 1995 that do not advocate strict, broad-based
standards like the 1983 standards.
The
1995 NRPA guidelines make it the community’s responsibility
to determine how they want to develop their parks and suggest that
communities shift from the application of a blind national standard
to an assessment of real time demand in the context of the local
community. This view takes into consideration the popular concept
of looking at parks and recreation land as an integrated system.
“The systems planning approach is defined as the process of
assessing the park, recreation and open space needs of a community
and translating that information into a framework for meeting the
physical, spatial and facility requirements to satisfy those needs.”[1]
This approach is a grassroots process where residents and recreation
advocates formulate minimum acreage and development criteria for
park and recreation resources and apply locally identified level
of service (LOS) guidelines. Together, these ensure that citizens
are not underserved.
The
NRPA formulated an eight-step process in their 1995 Guidelines to identify a local level of service that would give an
empirically sound assessment of the minimum amount of land
necessary per 1,000 people to meet a community’s recreational needs.
This eight-step process provides a methodical framework for the
assessment of level of service. These steps are:[2]
- Determine
park classifications
for which the LOS will apply.
- Determine
the recreation activity menu
(RAM), which is the list of all recreation facilities (i.e. tennis courts,
tot lots, picnic units, etc.), which go into each park classification and
for which a specific amount of space will be needed. The RAM determines
the facilities space requirement of the LOS formula.
- Determine
open space size standards
for each park classification for which LOS standards will apply [The
number of acres devoted to open space should be identified through
strategic community planning and take into account unique local resources
(pg. 49)].
- Determine
the present supply of
these recreation activity choices.
- Determine
total expressed demand for
these recreation activity choices.
- Determine
the minimum population service
requirements for these recreation activity choices.
- Determine
the individual LOS for
each park classification.
- Determine
the collective LOS
for the entire park and recreation system.
Current
City
of Canby
Park
Acreage
Canby’s
current park and recreation facility inventory consists of nine parks,
totaling 68.8 acres: Arneson
Garden, Wait Park, 19th Avenue Loop, Locust Street Park, Maple
Street Park, Canby Community Park, ECO Park, Skate Park (Phase I of the Canby
Regional Park), and 13th Avenue Park. Canby’s recreation facility
inventory also consists of the Logging Road Trail, Canby
Swim
Center
and Canby
Adult
Center. The wetland trail
listed in Table 8-1 is linked to Canby
Community
Park. Table
8-1 shows the breakdown of acreage for each park.
Applying
Canby’s current estimated population of 12,790, there are currently 5.38
acres of city-owned parkland in Canby per 1,000 residents (this figure
includes both developed and undeveloped parkland). This level of service
includes parkland but does not
include the three-mile Logging Road Trail or the protected open space and
wetland/riparian areas such as Willamette Wayside, Community
Park
wetland, Willow Creek,
or the Fish Eddy property. There is no standard for these types of open space,
but open space and trails received significant public support in the Park
Master Plan update process.
Table
8-1
City Of
Canby
Current
Park
Acreage
|
Park
|
Acreage
|
|
Mini-Parks
|
|
|
Arneson
Garden
|
1.8
|
|
Wait
Park
|
2.0
|
|
19th
Avenue Loop
|
1.8
|
|
Willow
Creek Wetland ((protected open space)
|
N/A
|
|
Willamette
Wayside (protected open space)
|
N/A
|
|
Locust
Street
Park
|
1.0
|
|
Total
|
6.6
|
|
Neighborhood
Parks
|
|
|
Maple
Street
Park
|
9.0
|
|
13th Avenue
Park
|
5.7
|
|
Total
|
14.7
|
|
Community
Parks
|
|
|
Canby
Community
Park
|
14.5
|
|
Eco
Park
|
19.0
|
|
Skate
Park
(Phase I of Canby
Regional
Park)
|
14.0
|
|
Total
|
47.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Logging Road Trail (open space trail)
|
N/A
|
|
Wetland
Trail (protected open space)
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
GRAND
TOTAL
|
68.8
|
|
Total/1,000 residents
|
5.38
|
Source:
City Of
Canby
Community
Planning Workshop, August 2000
School Facilities
The
NRPA strongly advocates building good relationships between school districts
and park and recreation agencies. The 1997 Community Survey found that Canby
residents already heavily use many of the school district’s facilities.
Canby
School District
facilities, however,
are not included in the Parks Master Plan Inventory because they are not
freely open during daylight hours to the public. School facilities are
primarily for students, and have limited hours available for the general
public. There may also be security issues for the school district based on an
inability to exclude recreation users from facilities not identified for
recreation uses. Moreover, the City desired to set standards for the City park
and recreation system.
While
school facilities are not usually available to the general public
during school hours, they provide significant recreation for sports
teams and the public during non-school hours. Five schools from
the Canby
School
District
are located within Canby; their grounds and facilities (including
non-recreation facilities) total 103.6 acres. Table
8-2, below, shows the acreage for each school. School properties
alone provide 8.16 acres per 1,000 residents.
Table
8-2
Canby
School
District Acreage
|
School
|
Acreage
|
|
Canby
High School
|
40.7
|
|
Ackerman
Middle School
|
15.9
|
|
Cecile
Trost Elementary
|
18.0
|
|
Howard
Eccles Elementary
|
9.7
|
|
William
Knight Elementary
|
19.3
|
|
GRAND TOTAL
|
103.6
|
|
Total/1,000 residents
|
8.16
|
Source:
Canby
School District
,
March 1997
Table
8-3 provides
a comparison of city owned and school district owned park and recreation land
per 1,000 residents. The combination of city park acreage
with school properties total 172.4 acres, or 13.54 acres of parkland per 1,000
Canby residents.
Table 8-3
Canby and
School
District
Park
and
Recreation Acreage
|
Ownership
|
Acres per 1,000 Persons
|
|
Canby
Park
and Recreation
Facilities
|
5.38
|
|
Canby
School District
Facilities
|
8.16
|
|
TOTAL Canby &
School District Facilities
|
13.54
|
Source: NRPA,
Blue Heron Recreation District,
School
District
Other Recreation Options
Several
other recreational resources are located within or near the Canby area:
Molalla
River
State Park, Clackamas County
Fairgrounds, and two golf courses. These facilities, while not owned by the
City of Canby, or the Canby
School District, provide valuable
recreation opportunities to Canby residents, and deserve consideration in our
standards analysis.
Molalla
River
State
Park,
located just north of Canby, is a 566-acre facility at the confluence
of the Molalla and Willamette
Rivers.
Canby-area residents of all ages use this park. It is classified
as a regional park, as it serves a broader purpose than a community
park. Although it is just outside Canby’s Urban Growth Boundary,
and not within our study area, it meets community based recreational
needs, as well as preserving unique open space.
Clackamas
County Fairgrounds provide recreation opportunities to Canby area residents.
The fairgrounds encompass 50 acres in Canby. Excluding the county fair in
August, the facility is used most frequently from September through June for a
variety of purposes including weddings, conventions, trade shows, and tractor
pulls.
One
non-municipal public golf course exists near Canby. Frontier Golf manages a
ten-acre, 9-hole par 3 golf course on North Holly Street. The facility is open
from the beginning of March until the end of October from
7:30 a.m.
until sunset. Another
golf course, operated by the Willamette Valley Country Club solely for its
members, is also located within Canby.
The
1995 NRPA guidelines list specific recreation facilities and provide
recommended sizes, dimensions and space requirements, as well as service
radius information. It should be noted that these spacing requirements were
utilized heavily in the 1983 NRPA standards and though they are included in
the 1995 NRPA guidelines, they are meant as a menu from which communities can
specifically decide which recreation facilities and amenities are needed in
their communities. The NRPA does not advocate constructing specialized
facilities without first obtaining market data that demonstrates a need
(market demand) for that facility.
The
1997 Community Survey results, stakeholder interviews, August
8, 2000
Community Forum outcome, and school meetings show a need for additional
soccer fields and swimming opportunities. Table 8-4 lists city
and school owned recreation facilities. The Canby
School
District
provides several of the recreation facilities not adequately provided
by the City of Canby
,
including football fields, volleyball courts, and additional tennis
courts and sports fields. Conversely, the City of Canby
has one 25-yard pool and one handball court, amenities the school
district does not provide. As previously discussed, the school
district provides significantly more recreation acreage than the
City of Canby,
but school property is not freely available to the public during
school hours.
Table 8-4
City of Canby Recreation Facilities
|
Facility
|
Actual City
|
Actual
School
District
|
Total
|
|
Basketball
Court
|
3
courts
|
11
courts
|
14
courts
|
|
Handball
Court
|
1
court
|
0
courts
|
1
court
|
|
Tennis
Court
|
2
courts
|
6
courts
|
8
courts
|
|
Baseball/Softball
|
2
fields
|
17
fields
|
19
fields
|
|
Football
|
0
fields
|
2
fields
|
2
fields
|
|
Volleyball
|
0
courts
|
11
courts
|
11
courts
|
|
Swimming
Pool
|
1
pool
|
0
pool
|
1
pool
|
|
Soccer
|
2
fields
|
8
fields
|
10
fields
|
|
Track
|
0
tracks
|
2
tracks
|
2
tracks
|
Source:
City of
Canby
and
Canby
School
District
NRPA Service Area Guidelines
The
NRPA promotes service area guidelines for different park classifications. CPW
used a Geographic Information System (GIS) to compare NRPA service area
guidelines with population density and recent development to illustrate which
areas of the city are most underserved by current parks. Figure 8-1 shows residential areas within Canby’s urban growth
boundary most underserved by its current park facilities (Wait
Park, Maple
Street
Park, Canby
Community
Park,
and Locust
Street
Park). Residents with the
least access to parks live in the far Northeast, Northwest, and South areas of
Canby. These are the areas of residential development (undeveloped parcels and
farmland were omitted), which are over ½ mile from current parks. The Swim
Center
and Adult
Center
are not included in the
analysis because they are specifically targeted recreational facilities.
Figure
8-1
The
four maps on the following pages show the City of Canby’s
current parks, current zoning classifications, and new development
since 1997, compared with the appropriate NRPA service area guidelines.
Areas of the City that fall outside of each circle (or service
area) represent residents not served by parks of that classification.
Figure
8-1
|
|
Click on Picture
to Enlarge |
The service
area for mini-parks is roughly one-quarter mile. Figure 8-2 shows Canby’s four mini-parks in comparison with
current zoning and recent development. Although the parks’ service areas
encompass areas of high density, most of Canby lacks mini-parks. This includes
several areas of higher density and new development, especially in the
northwest, southeast and north central areas of Canby.
Figure 8-2
|
Click
on Picture to Enlarge |
Figure
8-3
illustrates how the service area of Canby’s neighborhood park,
Maple
Street
Park, compares with zoning
and new development. The service area for a neighborhood park is a quarter to
a half-mile in distance. Neighborhood parks do not serve many of Canby’s
neighborhoods, the core of the park system.
Figure 8-3
|
|
Click
on Picture to enlarge |
The service area for community parks is between
a half-mile and three miles, serving two or more neighborhoods.
Since the 1997 Update, the Regional
Park and Eco
Park were added to
the inventory. The addition of Eco
Park provides Canby
residents with a community park in the northeast corner of town,
which was previously underserved. Figure
8-4 shows that most of Canby is served by a community park.
Figure
8-4
|
|
Click on Picture
to Enlarge |
Lastly, Figure 8-5
shows all of Canby’s parks compared to their respective service areas. Mini
or neighborhood parks do not serve new development in the southeast and areas
of high density to the northwest.
Figure 8-5
|
|
Click on Picture
to Enlarge |
Comparison with the 1997 Park Master Plan Update
Canby’s
1997 Parks Master Plan Update used the 1983 NRPA standards. These standards
represent a very broad measure and in theory, are meant to work for all
communities. The reality is that these standards become unrealistic for
smaller communities. This update, however, uses the 1995 NRPA guidelines,
which are more flexible and take into account community desires.
Canby’s
1996 population (the population used for the 1997 Update) was 11,430
residents. The ratio of parkland to residents was 2.95
acres per 1,000 residents. Since the adoption of the 1997 Master Plan
Update the following sites have been added to Canby’s park and recreation
inventory (see Chapter 3, Park and Recreation Facility Inventory for more
details): Logging Road Trail (approximately 3 miles in length and not included
in the total park acreage), Willamette Wayside (protected open space), Fish
Eddy riparian area (protected open space), Eco Park (undeveloped),
19th Avenue Loop (undeveloped), Arneson Garden, and Willow Creek
Wetland (protected open space). With the addition of these sites, Canby's
existing level of service is now 5.38 acres per 1,000 residents. It should
be noted that this level of service is for city-owned facilities only and does
not include school facilities. In comparison, Canby’s population has grown,
increasing by 1,540 residents since 1996.
Keep in mind that trails and protected open spaces are not counted in
the park acreage standards. The
park acreage standard is for mini-parks, neighborhood parks, and community
parks that are developed for the benefit of residential and business users in
the City limits.
Comparison with Population Projections and Community
Parks Standard
Although
population projections vary, it is important to forecast how many acres of
parkland will be needed for Canby’s future residents. Canby’s
Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 1984, is based on an
Urban Growth Boundary area to serve an ultimate population of 20,000. The 1991
Park Master Plan also used this figure when determining future park need (See
Chapter 2, Socioeconomic and Land Use Trends, for more details). The 2000
Update used the City's 2020 coordinated population projections.
Canby’s
community standard for parkland is expressed in acres per 1,000 residents. Discussions
between CPW, city staff, the Planning Commission and City Council, and the
Park and Recreation Advisory Board determined that 10 acres per 1,000
residents is the new park standard as of adoption of this update. Level of
service is also expressed in acres per 1,000 residents but it only tells the
current acreage per 1,000 residents and changes as new parkland is added to
the system. The standard of 10 acres per 1,000 residents is a policy decision
that will guide the development of the overall parks and recreation system.
Table
8-5 shows how
the current inventory and level of service of Canby’s park and recreation
facilities compares to a projected population of 21,000. Table 8-5 also shows
how many acres are necessary to meet the community standard of 10 aces per
1,000 residents as population grows over the next 15 years.
In
order to accommodate future growth at the current level of service, additional
park and recreation acquisition and development must occur. To serve a
population of 21,000 at the current level of service, Canby will need 113
acres of parkland, or 44.2 acres
of new parkland. The number of
new acres needed is derived from applying the current LOS (5.38 acres/1,000
people) to the future population and identifying the deficit between the same
level of service now and for the future population. To meet the new
community standard of 10 acres per 1,000 residents in 20 years, Canby will
need 210 acres of total parkland, or 141.2 acres of new parkland. This
amount of acreage is derived from applying the standard (10 acres/1,000
people) to the future population of 21,000 people.
The
addition of new parks increased the level of service from 2.95 acres per 1,000
residents to 5.38 acres per 1,000 residents, an increase of 2.43 acres per
1,000. By following the
recommendations in Chapter 9 Canby will be able to achieve the new standard as
the population increases to 21,000.
Table
8-5
2000 Level of Service & New Community Standard
Applied to Future Population of 21,000
|
Ownership
|
Existing LOS at Current Population
|
Existing LOS at Future
Population
|
New Acres Needed to
Maintain Existing LOS
|
New Acres Needed to
Achieve Community Standard
|
|
City
of
Canby
Park
and Recreation
Facilities
|
5.38
acres/1,000 people
|
3.27
acres/1,000 people
|
44.2
|
141.2
|
Source: NRPA, City of
Canby
Community Input
The
August 8, 2000
Community Forum
identified park connectivity as an important goal in Canby's park and
recreation facility development. The NRPA and the Oregon
Parks
and Recreation
Department also advocate linking park space via trails, pathways and bike
routes/lanes. Participants in the August 8, 2000 Community Forum acknowledged
that the Logging Road (three linear miles) is a significant trail for linking
park space, and the city should expand upon this trail when linking park and
recreational space within Canby. A multi-use trail around the perimeter of
Canby (the “Emerald Necklace concept”), connecting parks, recreation
areas, protected open space, and schools was identified over and over again as
a desirable goal for recreation development in Canby. While no measurable
standard exists for these improvements and amenities, their importance should
not be overlooked.
The
NRPA standards are a valuable and nationally accepted guideline for
determining adequacy of parkland, though there are a number of specific park
types and facilities that standards are not explicitly provided for.
Playgrounds, trails, open space and natural areas were all identified by
community members in the 1997 Canby Park
and Recreation Community Survey, stakeholder interviews, August 8, 2000
Community Forum, and student meetings as desired improvements to Canby’s
park and recreation system.
Findings
| * |
Canby
currently has 5.38 acres of city-owned developed parkland
per 1,000 residents and 8.16 acres of school district-owned
facilities per 1,000 residents. |
| * |
Using
a projected population of 21,000 residents in 20 years shows
that 44.2 additional acres of city owned, developed parkland
would be needed to meet the current LOS of 5.38 acres of developed
parkland per 1,000 residents in the future. In order to
achieve the new community standard of 10 acres of developed
parkland per 1,000 residents, 141.2 additional acres of city
owned parkland is needed over the next 20 years. |
| * |
There
are no national standards for park and recreation amenities
such as trails, playgrounds, open space and natural areas,
though their importance to Canby residents is identified
in the 1997 Canby
Park and Recreation Community Survey, stakeholder interviews,
August 8, 2000 Community Forum, and student meetings. |
| * |
Mini
or neighborhood parks do not serve new development in the
southeast and areas of high density to the northwest.
|
[1] Mertes, James D. and Hall, James R.,
1995, Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines, Washington,
DC, National Park and Recreation Association, page 1
Last
Update
01/07/2003
Return to Parks Master Plan table of contents
|